Diablo_ClaudeMD_Ricing_example/skills/decision-toolkit/templates/decision-framework.md
diablo 50fa79407d
Some checks are pending
CI — CoM Config Validation / Validate JSON Configs (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Validate YAML Configs (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Lint Shell Scripts (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Secret Detection (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Lint Markdown (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Validate CODEOWNERS (push) Waiting to run
CoM Claude Command Center — sanitized public configuration
Public, sanitized mirror of an AI orchestration command center: agents, skills,
MCP servers, slash-command workflows. All infrastructure identifiers, hostnames,
mesh IPs/subnets, repo paths, maintainer identity, and hardware fleet specifics
scrubbed to <placeholders>; session debug logs and host-specific memory removed.
No live credentials. Verified clean by automated leak sweep. See SANITIZATION.md.

churchofmalware.org . authorized research only
2026-06-10 02:02:03 -04:00

3.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Decision Framework: {{DECISION_TITLE}}

Generated: {{DATE}}


1. The Decision

Question: {{DECISION_QUESTION}}

Context: {{CONTEXT}}

Key Tension: {{KEY_TENSION}}


2. First Principles Test

Core Question: Does this solve a problem you cannot solve yourself?

Your Current Capabilities: {{CURRENT_CAPABILITIES}}

Assessment: [ ] No — I can do this myself | [ ] Partial — some unique value | [ ] Yes — solves what I can't

Notes:


3. Timing Assessment

Factor Value Notes
Weeks until key milestone
Hours/week available
Total hours before milestone

Timing verdict: Is now the right time?


4. Stakeholder Analysis

Key stakeholders: {{STAKEHOLDER_INFO}}

Stability assessment (1-10): ____

Score Interpretation
1-3 High risk — low confidence in stability
4-6 Moderate — monitor for changes
7-10 Solid — verify this is evidence-based

5. Bias Audit

Check any biases you recognize in yourself:

  • FOMO — Fear of missing a rare opportunity

    • Counter: What evidence suggests this is truly unique?
  • Sunk Cost — Factoring in past investment of time/money

    • Counter: Past investment is gone. This decision is forward-looking.
  • Authority Bias — Influenced by credentials or status

    • Counter: Authority ≠ correctness or fit for you.
  • Social Proof — Following because others are

    • Counter: Others' choices may not match your context.
  • Commitment Consistency — Feeling obligated by past statements

    • Counter: New information justifies reassessment.
  • Optimism Bias — Assuming problems will resolve

    • Counter: Look at patterns, not hopes.
  • Recency Bias — Overweighting recent events

    • Counter: Consider the full timeline.
  • Confirmation Bias — Seeking only validating information

    • Counter: What would disprove this?
  • Shiny Object — Attracted by novelty

    • Counter: Is this genuinely better, or just new?
  • Loss Aversion — Overweighting potential losses

    • Counter: Compare actual probabilities.

Total biases identified: ____


6. Opportunity Cost Calculator

Component Value
Hours/week × Weeks
× Hourly rate
= Direct cost

What else could that time produce?

  1. {{ALTERNATIVE_1}}
  2. {{ALTERNATIVE_2}}
  3. {{ALTERNATIVE_3}}

True opportunity cost assessment:


7. Scenario Matrix

Scenario Probability Outcome Notes
Worst case {{WORST_PROB}}% {{WORST_OUTCOME}}
Bad case %
Neutral {{NEUTRAL_PROB}}% {{NEUTRAL_OUTCOME}}
Good case %
Best case {{BEST_PROB}}% {{BEST_OUTCOME}}

Expected value assessment:


8. Pre-Mortem

Imagine it's {{FUTURE_DATE}}. This decision failed. Why?

Possible causes: 1. 2. 3.

Which are within my control?

Warning signs to watch for:


9. Questions to Resolve

Before deciding, get answers to:

{{QUESTIONS_LIST}}


10. The 10-10-10 Framework

How will I feel about this decision in...

  • 10 minutes?
  • 10 months?
  • 10 years?

11. Regret Minimization

Imagine you're 80 looking back.

  • Would you regret doing this?
  • Would you regret NOT doing this?

12. Decision

Options: {{DECISION_OPTIONS}}

My decision:

Rationale:

Boundary statement (what I will and won't do):

Review date:


Summary

Factor Assessment
Solves unique problem
Timing
Stakeholder stability
Biases identified
Opportunity cost
Probability of success
Regret profile

Final recommendation: