Diablo_ClaudeMD_Ricing_example/.github/SECURITY.md
diablo 50fa79407d
Some checks are pending
CI — CoM Config Validation / Validate JSON Configs (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Validate YAML Configs (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Lint Shell Scripts (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Secret Detection (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Lint Markdown (push) Waiting to run
CI — CoM Config Validation / Validate CODEOWNERS (push) Waiting to run
CoM Claude Command Center — sanitized public configuration
Public, sanitized mirror of an AI orchestration command center: agents, skills,
MCP servers, slash-command workflows. All infrastructure identifiers, hostnames,
mesh IPs/subnets, repo paths, maintainer identity, and hardware fleet specifics
scrubbed to <placeholders>; session debug logs and host-specific memory removed.
No live credentials. Verified clean by automated leak sweep. See SANITIZATION.md.

churchofmalware.org . authorized research only
2026-06-10 02:02:03 -04:00

68 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown

# Security Policy — CoM Solutions
## Supported Versions
| Version | Supported |
| ------- | ------------------ |
| 1.0.x | :white_check_mark: |
## Reporting a Vulnerability
**Do NOT open a public issue for security vulnerabilities.**
### Preferred Method
Use [GitHub Security Advisories](https://github.com/CoM-Solutions/CoM-claude-config/security/advisories/new) to report vulnerabilities privately.
### Alternative
Email: maintainer@example.com with subject line `[SECURITY] CoM-claude-config: <brief description>`
### What to Include
- Description of the vulnerability
- Steps to reproduce
- Potential impact assessment
- Suggested fix (if you have one)
### Response Timeline
- **Acknowledgment:** Within 48 hours
- **Initial Assessment:** Within 1 week
- **Fix Timeline:** Depends on severity
- Critical: 24-48 hours
- High: 1 week
- Medium: 2 weeks
- Low: Next scheduled release
### Scope
This security policy covers:
- Hook scripts that validate and gate command execution
- Permission deny lists in settings.json
- Agent permission boundaries and escalation paths
- MCP server configurations and authentication
- Constitutional governance rules
- Secret management and credential protection
- CI/CD pipeline security
### Out of Scope
- Vulnerabilities in upstream tools (Claude Code, Kilo Code, GitHub Copilot, Gemini)
- Vulnerabilities in MCP server packages themselves (report to package maintainers)
- Issues in the Syn_OS repository (use that repo's security policy)
## Security Architecture
This project implements a 4-layer defense model:
1. **Permission Deny List** — Hard blocks on destructive patterns in settings.json
2. **PreToolUse Hook** — Pattern matching against known dangerous commands
3. **Haiku Prompt Guard** — AI-powered secondary check on Bash commands
4. **PostToolUse Scan** — Downloaded file validation for obfuscated content
## Disclosure Policy
We follow coordinated disclosure. We will credit reporters in our security advisories unless anonymity is requested.