Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
leetcrypt f4e1975daa SS4: fill lead-paper Results/Discussion from the frozen §6 pass
Populate docs/stage-07-paper-draft.md §5 Results + §6 Discussion ONCE, after
the battery sealed, from the single SS3 inferential pass — the blind-authored
§1–4/7 are unchanged. Abstract + §1 contributions updated to the honest
double-null/negative headline.

- §5.1 calibration gate PASS (known-linked AUC 1.0000, unlinked 0.5036).
- §5.2 RQ1-P1 AUC 0.466 [0.452,0.480] = anomaly-below-chance (NO leak);
  RQ1-P2 ΔAUC +0.011 [−0.002,+0.023] padding-ineffective (moot).
- §5.3 RQ2-P1 ΔH −0.96 bits [−1.06,−0.86] SHRINK, reported with equal
  prominence (not reframed as "helps"); RQ2-P3 ρ=0 degenerate/inconclusive.
- §5.4 Holm table (family=7, report-4); only RQ1-P1 + RQ2-P1 survive @ .05.
- §6 honest interpretation; §7 adds the funnelling-degeneracy limitation;
  §8 marks the RQ2 posterior + RQ1-P2 pairing ratified and notes the
  bit-faithful RQ1 bootstrap.

No spin, no re-slicing, no post-hoc subgroups. Frozen prereg SHA intact.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-21 00:58:50 -07:00
leetcrypt 4976aed3e5 SS4: data-independent lead-paper draft (G4+RQ1+RQ2), written blind
docs/stage-07-paper-draft.md — Abstract skeleton, Intro (consent-gate novelty
G4 + RQ1 bridge-leak / RQ2 funnelling motivation), Related Work, full Methods
from the frozen prereg §2-§6, Limitations §7, References. Results/Discussion are
HELD-BLIND placeholders (battery still running, zero confirmatory numbers seen);
RQ2 subsections additionally gated on the pending posterior-construction
ratification. Frozen prereg untouched; no RQ2 statistic computed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-20 00:20:30 -07:00