- Correct grid disclosure to match the sealed device-map: single-laptop
isolated-docker host; the two phones are pinned consenting-node labels
(can_host_engine=false / isolated_engine_available=false), never forwarders
and carrying no measured traffic — across abstract, apparatus, scope, and
limitations, plus the companion methods.
- Replace two dangling `PHONE-ROLE-AUDIT.md` citations (file never existed)
with the real artifact that substantiates the claim: grid/device-map.json;
vendor that artifact so the citation resolves in a clean clone.
- Drop the stale "(skeleton — quantitative claims held...)" abstract label now
that the abstract is filled and RQ2 is ratified.
- Disclose that the study was staged, pre-registered, and executed under the
Interpretable Context Methodology (ICM) [VanClief2026]; add the reference.
- Repoint the bibliography citation to the vendored docs/sor-consent-bibliography.md.
- Regenerate the paper site from the corrected markdown.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paper (stage-07 lead): add an Apparatus disclosure (§4.3) and a Node-distribution
limitation (§7) stating that all relay hops ran as isolated Docker containers on a
single engine host and the two phones were consenting endpoints, not forwarders.
Containment (engine != local) holds; cross-machine timing is out of scope / future work.
Add the self-contained study site (docs/paper-site/: build_site.py, index.html) built
straight from the sealed paper markdown, plus a generator + six 1080x1920 Instagram-story
teaser slides (make_story_slides.py, story/) using only sealed, audited numbers. Defensive
measurement framing throughout; the pre-registered nulls are reported, not spun.
Self red-team of the SS4-filled lead paper against the sealed SS3 results
(no new statistic, no raw-data touch, frozen prereg untouched). Documented in
docs/stage-08-adversarial-review.md.
PASS: number fidelity (every §5 figure matches stage06-results.json), Holm
arithmetic (family=7, multipliers 7/6/5/4, only RQ1-P1+RQ2-P1 survive @ .05),
spin/over-claim (no-leak framing for the below-chance AUC, honest-negative
reported with equal prominence, lab-scope disclaimers), blinding integrity
(§5-6 filled once post-seal), method faithfulness (bit-faithful --verify).
Defect fixed (prose only, ZERO numbers changed): RQ1-P1's marginally
below-chance AUC was incorrectly attributed to a bridge "padding stream
flattening" the profile. assembler.py sets padding_applied=(bridge==
"on+padding"), so the RQ1-P1 bridge-on NO-PAD arm carries no cover stream.
Corrected docs/stage-06-analysis.md and paper §5.2/§6 to state the offset is
an unexplained pooled-correlator artifact, explicitly not a padding effect.
Point estimate, CI, gate decision, and Holm outcome are unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/stage-07-paper-draft.md — Abstract skeleton, Intro (consent-gate novelty
G4 + RQ1 bridge-leak / RQ2 funnelling motivation), Related Work, full Methods
from the frozen prereg §2-§6, Limitations §7, References. Results/Discussion are
HELD-BLIND placeholders (battery still running, zero confirmatory numbers seen);
RQ2 subsections additionally gated on the pending posterior-construction
ratification. Frozen prereg untouched; no RQ2 statistic computed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
leetcrypt