## Summary Added real-world testing infrastructure with 11 actual Flipper Zero community captures. Results reveal **CRITICAL GAP**: 0% accuracy on real captures vs 33% on synthetic signals. ## What Was Added ### Test Infrastructure - **tests/real_captures/** - 11 real .sub files from UberGuidoZ/Flipper repository - 3 weather sensors (LaCrosse, Acurite, Nexus) - 2 garage doors (LiftMaster 433MHz, Security+ 2.0) - 2 doorbells (GE, Byron) - 1 LED remote - 3 ceiling fan controls - **tests/real_captures/manifest.json** - Test case metadata with expected protocols - **scripts/benchmark_real.py** - Real-world benchmark runner - Loads manifest.json - Runs identification on each capture - Generates REAL_TEST_RESULTS.md - Compares with synthetic results ### Documentation - **REAL_TEST_RESULTS.md** - Benchmark results (0% accuracy) - **docs/REAL_CAPTURE_ANALYSIS.md** - Comprehensive gap analysis ## Results ### Performance Comparison | Metric | Synthetic | Real-World | Delta | |--------|-----------|------------|-------| | Top-1 Accuracy | 33.3% | **0.0%** | **-33.3%** | | Top-3 Accuracy | 50.0% | **0.0%** | **-50.0%** | | High Confidence | 66.7% | 9.1% | -57.6% | | No Matches | 8.3% | **45.5%** | +37.2% | ### Root Causes Identified 1. **Decoded File Format (45% of failures)** - CRITICAL - 5/11 files are already decoded (Protocol: Holtek_HT12X), not RAW - Our system ONLY processes RAW_Data - All ceiling fan and LED remote files fail immediately - **Fix**: Add support for parsed decode .sub file format 2. **Missing Protocols (27% of failures)** - Acurite 02077M not in database (we have 609TXC) - GE Doorbell 19297 not in database - Byron DB421E not in database - LiftMaster not in database - **Fix**: Add these protocols from real captures 3. **Real Signal Complexity (27% of failures)** - LaCrosse real capture: 131 pulses (multi-packet) - Synthetic LaCrosse: 40 bits (single packet) - Real signals have noise, jitter, interference - **Fix**: Packet segmentation, higher noise tolerance 4. **Protocol Family Competition (9% of failures)** - Nexus found at rank 34 (beaten by Oregon Scientific) - Similar protocols competing instead of grouping - **Fix**: Protocol family scoring ## Key Insights ### Why Synthetic Worked (33% accuracy): - Perfect timing with controlled 5-15% jitter - Single packet per file - All RAW format - Known protocol parameters ### Why Real Failed (0% accuracy): - 45% already decoded (not RAW) - 27% missing from database - Variable signal quality - Multi-packet transmissions - Real-world interference **Conclusion**: System was optimized for unrealistic synthetic signals. ## Recommendations (Priority Order) 1. **P1 - Support Decoded Files** (+45% accuracy) - Parse Protocol, Bit, Key, TE fields - Match by protocol name + timing element - Skip RAW analysis for decoded files 2. **P2 - Add Missing Protocols** (+27% accuracy) - Import Acurite 02077M, GE/Byron doorbells, LiftMaster, Holtek HT12X - Source from real captures or RTL_433 updates 3. **P3 - Improve Robustness** (+18% accuracy) - Packet segmentation for multi-transmission captures - Increase jitter tolerance to 25% - Repetition detection 4. **P4 - Family Grouping** (+9% accuracy) - Group similar protocols (Nexus/Oregon/Acurite) - Boost exact name matches **Expected Final Accuracy**: 60-70% after P1+P2 implementation. ## Files Changed - tests/real_captures/*.sub (11 files, 192KB) - tests/real_captures/manifest.json (11 test cases) - scripts/benchmark_real.py (370 lines) - REAL_TEST_RESULTS.md (benchmark results) - docs/REAL_CAPTURE_ANALYSIS.md (comprehensive analysis) 🎯 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.9 KiB
Real-World Capture Analysis - Gap Between Synthetic and Real Performance
Date: 2026-02-15 Benchmark: Real Flipper Zero Community Captures vs Synthetic Test Signals
Executive Summary
CRITICAL FINDING: The RF device identification system achieves 0% accuracy on real-world captures vs 33% on synthetic signals. This represents a complete failure to generalize from synthetic to real-world data.
Performance Comparison
| Metric | Synthetic | Real-World | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top-1 Accuracy | 33.3% (4/12) | 0.0% (0/11) | -33.3% |
| Top-3 Accuracy | 50.0% (6/12) | 0.0% (0/11) | -50.0% |
| High Confidence (>80%) | 66.7% | 9.1% | -57.6% |
| No Matches Found | 8.3% (1/12) | 45.5% (5/11) | +37.2% |
Root Causes
1. Decoded vs RAW File Format (5/11 failures = 45%)
Problem: Many real Flipper captures are already decoded, not RAW.
Evidence:
- All 3 ceiling fan files:
Protocol: Holtek_HT12X(decoded) - RGB LED remote: Already decoded
- LiftMaster Security+ 2.0: Already decoded
Example (ceiling_fan_real.sub):
Filetype: Flipper SubGhz Key File
Version: 1
Frequency: 315000000
Preset: FuriHalSubGhzPresetOok650Async
Protocol: Holtek_HT12X # <-- Already decoded!
Bit: 12
Key: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 BF
TE: 470
Impact: Our system only processes RAW_Data. Decoded files have has_raw_data=False, so the pattern decoder immediately returns empty results.
Fix Required: Add support for decoded .sub files:
- Parse
Protocol,Bit,Key,TEfields - Match against database by protocol name + timing element
- Synthesize timing from TE (timing element) if needed
2. Real Signal Noise & Complexity (3/11 failures = 27%)
Problem: Real captures have:
- Variable signal quality
- Multi-packet transmissions
- Long pulse trains (LaCrosse: 131 pulses total)
- Interference and jitter beyond our 15% tolerance
Evidence:
lacrosse_tx141_real.sub: 131 pulses, very long RAW_Data- Top match: "Schou 72543 Day Rain Gauge" (69.1%) - WRONG
- Expected "LaCrosse TX141-BV2" not found in top 100
Analysis: Real LaCrosse signals are much longer and noisier than our 40-bit synthetic version.
3. Missing Protocols in Database (3/11 failures = 27%)
Problem: Expected protocols not in our 299-protocol database:
- "Acurite 02077M" → Not in database (we have Acurite 609TXC, but not 02077M variant)
- "GE Doorbell 19297" → Not in database
- "Byron Doorbell DB421E" → Not in database (Byron got Princeton at 92.9%)
Evidence:
Byron doorbell → Princeton (92.9% confidence)
GE doorbell → Conrad S3318P sensor (76.9% confidence)
Impact: Even with perfect timing extraction, we can't match protocols that don't exist in the database.
4. Protocol Name Matching Too Strict (1/11 = 9%)
Problem: nexus_th_real.sub matched "Nexus Temperature-Humidity" but at rank 34.
Top 5 Results:
- Oregon Scientific Weather Sensor (76.9%)
- Oregon Scientific v3.0 (75.9%)
- Oregon Scientific v2.1 (74.2%)
- Ambient Weather F007TH (63.5%)
- Digitech XC-0324 (58.4%) ...
- Nexus Temperature-Humidity
Analysis: Nexus is getting matched, but Oregon protocols score higher. This suggests:
- Timing similarity between Nexus and Oregon
- Preamble detection favoring Oregon
- Need protocol-family grouping (Nexus vs Oregon shouldn't compete directly)
Detailed Failure Analysis
Weather Sensors (0/3 correct)
1. LaCrosse TX141-BV2 Real Capture
- Expected: LaCrosse TX141-BV2
- Got: Schou 72543 Day Rain Gauge (69.1%)
- Rank: Not found
Issue: Real capture has 131 pulses vs synthetic 40 bits. Likely multiple transmissions in one capture.
2. Acurite 02077M
- Expected: Acurite 02077M
- Got: LaCrosse Technology View LTV-R1 (76.5%)
- Rank: Not found
Issue: Acurite 02077M not in database. We have Acurite 609TXC but not this model.
3. Nexus Temperature-Humidity
- Expected: Nexus Temperature-Humidity
- Got: Oregon Scientific Weather Sensor (76.9%)
- Rank: 34
Issue: Protocol exists but ranks low. Oregon and Nexus are similar protocols competing.
Garage Doors (0/2 correct)
1. LiftMaster 433MHz
- Expected: LiftMaster
- Got: AlectoV1 Weather Sensor (49.4%)
- Rank: Not found
Issue: LiftMaster not in database. Low confidence (49%) suggests poor timing match.
2. LiftMaster Security+ 2.0
- Expected: LiftMaster Security+ 2.0
- Got: No matches (0%)
- Rank: Not found
Issue: Decoded file format. No RAW_Data to process. Security+ 2.0 uses rolling codes.
Doorbells (0/2 correct)
1. GE Doorbell 19297
- Expected: GE Doorbell
- Got: Conrad S3318P sensor (76.9%)
- Rank: Not found
Issue: GE Doorbell not in database. Misidentified as temperature sensor.
2. Byron Doorbell DB421E
- Expected: Byron Doorbell
- Got: Princeton (92.9%)
- Rank: Not found
Issue: Byron not in database. High confidence match to Princeton suggests similar timing (Princeton-like protocol).
LED/Fan Controllers (0/4 correct)
All 4 files: No matches (0%)
Issue: All are decoded format, not RAW. Our system cannot process them.
Files:
rgb_led_remote_real.sub- Decodedceiling_fan_real.sub- Decoded (Holtek_HT12X)ceiling_fan2_real.sub- Decoded (Holtek_HT12X)ceiling_fan_light_real.sub- Decoded (Holtek_HT12X)
Recommendations
Priority 1: Support Decoded .sub Files (Fixes 45% of failures)
Implementation:
def parse_sub_file(filepath):
"""Parse both RAW and decoded .sub files"""
metadata = SignalMetadata()
with open(filepath) as f:
# ... existing parsing ...
# If no RAW_Data but has Protocol field
if not metadata.has_raw_data and metadata.protocol:
# This is a decoded file
# Extract: Protocol, Bit, Key, TE
# Match by protocol name + TE timing
metadata.is_decoded = True
metadata.timing_element = te_value
return metadata
Database Matching:
- For decoded files, match primarily by
Protocolfield name - Use
TE(timing element) as secondary confirmation - Skip RAW pattern analysis
Priority 2: Add Missing Protocols (Fixes 27% of failures)
Protocols to Add:
- Acurite 02077M - Weather station (433.92 MHz)
- GE Doorbell 19297 - Doorbell (433.92 MHz)
- Byron DB421E - Doorbell (433.92 MHz)
- LiftMaster (generic 433 MHz) - Garage door
- Holtek HT12X - LED/Fan remote encoder chip
Source: Import from real captures or RTL_433 database updates.
Priority 3: Improve Real Signal Robustness (Fixes 27% of failures)
Issues:
- Long multi-packet captures (131 pulses vs 40 bits)
- Variable signal quality
- Packet repetition detection needed
Fixes:
- Packet Segmentation: Split long RAW_Data into individual transmissions
- Repetition Detection: Find repeating patterns, score best match
- Noise Filtering: Increase jitter tolerance from 15% to 25% for real data
- Confidence Calibration: Lower thresholds for real-world data
Priority 4: Protocol Family Grouping (Fixes 9% of failures)
Issue: Nexus ranks #34, beaten by Oregon Scientific variants.
Fix:
- Group similar protocols (Nexus, Oregon Scientific, Acurite all use similar encoding)
- Score by protocol family first, then by specific model
- Boost exact name matches over family matches
Performance Expectations After Fixes
| Fix | Impact | Expected Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| Support decoded files | +45% (5/11) | 45% |
| Add missing protocols | +27% (3/11) | 72% |
| Improve robustness | +18% (2/11) | 90% |
| Family grouping | +9% (1/11) | 100% |
Realistic Target: 60-70% top-1 accuracy after implementing Priority 1 and 2.
Synthetic vs Real: Why the Gap?
Synthetic Signals (33% accuracy)
- ✅ Perfect timing (no jitter beyond 5-15%)
- ✅ Single packet per file
- ✅ Known protocol parameters
- ✅ All RAW format
- ❌ Unrealistic simplicity
Real Captures (0% accuracy)
- ❌ 45% are decoded (not RAW)
- ❌ 27% use protocols not in database
- ❌ Variable signal quality
- ❌ Multi-packet transmissions
- ❌ Real-world interference
- ✅ Actual device behavior
Conclusion: Our system was optimized for synthetic signals that don't represent real-world usage.
Next Steps
- Immediate: Implement decoded .sub file support (Priority 1)
- Short-term: Add missing protocols from real captures (Priority 2)
- Medium-term: Improve noise tolerance and packet segmentation (Priority 3)
- Long-term: Collect more real captures for training/validation
Generated: 2026-02-15 Benchmark Version: Iteration 6 (post-precision tuning) Database Size: 299 protocols (RTL_433 imported) Real Captures Source: UberGuidoZ/Flipper repository