test: add real-world Flipper Zero capture benchmark - CRITICAL FINDINGS
## Summary Added real-world testing infrastructure with 11 actual Flipper Zero community captures. Results reveal **CRITICAL GAP**: 0% accuracy on real captures vs 33% on synthetic signals. ## What Was Added ### Test Infrastructure - **tests/real_captures/** - 11 real .sub files from UberGuidoZ/Flipper repository - 3 weather sensors (LaCrosse, Acurite, Nexus) - 2 garage doors (LiftMaster 433MHz, Security+ 2.0) - 2 doorbells (GE, Byron) - 1 LED remote - 3 ceiling fan controls - **tests/real_captures/manifest.json** - Test case metadata with expected protocols - **scripts/benchmark_real.py** - Real-world benchmark runner - Loads manifest.json - Runs identification on each capture - Generates REAL_TEST_RESULTS.md - Compares with synthetic results ### Documentation - **REAL_TEST_RESULTS.md** - Benchmark results (0% accuracy) - **docs/REAL_CAPTURE_ANALYSIS.md** - Comprehensive gap analysis ## Results ### Performance Comparison | Metric | Synthetic | Real-World | Delta | |--------|-----------|------------|-------| | Top-1 Accuracy | 33.3% | **0.0%** | **-33.3%** | | Top-3 Accuracy | 50.0% | **0.0%** | **-50.0%** | | High Confidence | 66.7% | 9.1% | -57.6% | | No Matches | 8.3% | **45.5%** | +37.2% | ### Root Causes Identified 1. **Decoded File Format (45% of failures)** - CRITICAL - 5/11 files are already decoded (Protocol: Holtek_HT12X), not RAW - Our system ONLY processes RAW_Data - All ceiling fan and LED remote files fail immediately - **Fix**: Add support for parsed decode .sub file format 2. **Missing Protocols (27% of failures)** - Acurite 02077M not in database (we have 609TXC) - GE Doorbell 19297 not in database - Byron DB421E not in database - LiftMaster not in database - **Fix**: Add these protocols from real captures 3. **Real Signal Complexity (27% of failures)** - LaCrosse real capture: 131 pulses (multi-packet) - Synthetic LaCrosse: 40 bits (single packet) - Real signals have noise, jitter, interference - **Fix**: Packet segmentation, higher noise tolerance 4. **Protocol Family Competition (9% of failures)** - Nexus found at rank 34 (beaten by Oregon Scientific) - Similar protocols competing instead of grouping - **Fix**: Protocol family scoring ## Key Insights ### Why Synthetic Worked (33% accuracy): - Perfect timing with controlled 5-15% jitter - Single packet per file - All RAW format - Known protocol parameters ### Why Real Failed (0% accuracy): - 45% already decoded (not RAW) - 27% missing from database - Variable signal quality - Multi-packet transmissions - Real-world interference **Conclusion**: System was optimized for unrealistic synthetic signals. ## Recommendations (Priority Order) 1. **P1 - Support Decoded Files** (+45% accuracy) - Parse Protocol, Bit, Key, TE fields - Match by protocol name + timing element - Skip RAW analysis for decoded files 2. **P2 - Add Missing Protocols** (+27% accuracy) - Import Acurite 02077M, GE/Byron doorbells, LiftMaster, Holtek HT12X - Source from real captures or RTL_433 updates 3. **P3 - Improve Robustness** (+18% accuracy) - Packet segmentation for multi-transmission captures - Increase jitter tolerance to 25% - Repetition detection 4. **P4 - Family Grouping** (+9% accuracy) - Group similar protocols (Nexus/Oregon/Acurite) - Boost exact name matches **Expected Final Accuracy**: 60-70% after P1+P2 implementation. ## Files Changed - tests/real_captures/*.sub (11 files, 192KB) - tests/real_captures/manifest.json (11 test cases) - scripts/benchmark_real.py (370 lines) - REAL_TEST_RESULTS.md (benchmark results) - docs/REAL_CAPTURE_ANALYSIS.md (comprehensive analysis) 🎯 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
|
||||
# RF Device Identification - Real-World Benchmark Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Date**: 1771207572.2499428
|
||||
**Total Tests**: 11
|
||||
**Source**: Real Flipper Zero community captures
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### Top-K Accuracy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Top-1**: 0.0%
|
||||
- **Top-3**: 0.0%
|
||||
- **Top-5**: 0.0%
|
||||
|
||||
### Confidence Distribution
|
||||
|
||||
- **High (>80%)**: 1 (9.1%)
|
||||
- **Medium (50-80%)**: 4 (36.4%)
|
||||
- **Low (<50%)**: 1 (9.1%)
|
||||
- **None found**: 5 (45.5%)
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance
|
||||
|
||||
- **Avg Parse Time**: 0.28 ms
|
||||
- **Avg Match Time**: 128.19 ms
|
||||
- **Total**: 128.46 ms
|
||||
|
||||
## By Category
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Tests | Top-1 Acc | Top-3 Acc |
|
||||
|----------|-------|-----------|------------|
|
||||
| doorbell | 2 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
|
||||
| fan_controller | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
|
||||
| garage_door | 2 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
|
||||
| led_controller | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
|
||||
| weather_sensor | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
|
||||
|
||||
## Detailed Results
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ lacrosse_tx141_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: LaCrosse TX141-BV2
|
||||
- **Category**: weather_sensor
|
||||
- **Got**: Schou 72543 Day Rain Gauge, Motonet MTX Rain, MarQuant Rain Gauge, TFA Dostmann 30.3252.01/47.3006.01 Rain Gauge and Thermometer, ADE WS1907 (confidence: 69.1%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
**Top 5 Matches**:
|
||||
1. Schou 72543 Day Rain Gauge, Motonet MTX Rain, MarQuant Rain Gauge, TFA Dostmann 30.3252.01/47.3006.01 Rain Gauge and Thermometer, ADE WS1907 (69.1%)
|
||||
2. Conrad S3318P, FreeTec NC-5849-913 temperature humidity sensor, ORIA WA50 ST389 temperature sensor (68.6%)
|
||||
3. WEC-2103 temperature/humidity sensor (68.6%)
|
||||
4. ThermoPro TX-2C Thermometer and Humidity sensor (68.0%)
|
||||
5. Biltema rain gauge (67.7%)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ acurite_02077m_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: Acurite 02077M
|
||||
- **Category**: weather_sensor
|
||||
- **Got**: LaCrosse Technology View LTV-R1, LTV-R3 Rainfall Gauge, LTV-W1/W2 Wind Sensor (confidence: 76.5%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
**Top 5 Matches**:
|
||||
1. LaCrosse Technology View LTV-R1, LTV-R3 Rainfall Gauge, LTV-W1/W2 Wind Sensor (76.5%)
|
||||
2. LaCrosse Technology View LTV-TH Thermo/Hygro Sensor (76.5%)
|
||||
3. LaCrosse TX35DTH-IT, TFA Dostmann 30.3155 Temperature/Humidity sensor (76.4%)
|
||||
4. TFA Marbella Pool Thermometer (76.4%)
|
||||
5. ThermoPro TP28b Super Long Range Wireless Meat Thermometer for Smoker BBQ Grill (76.4%)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ nexus_th_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: Nexus Temperature-Humidity
|
||||
- **Category**: weather_sensor
|
||||
- **Got**: Oregon Scientific Weather Sensor (confidence: 76.9%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: 34
|
||||
|
||||
**Top 5 Matches**:
|
||||
1. Oregon Scientific Weather Sensor (76.9%)
|
||||
2. Oregon Scientific v3.0 (75.9%)
|
||||
3. Oregon Scientific v2.1 (74.2%)
|
||||
4. Ambient Weather F007TH (63.5%)
|
||||
5. Digitech XC-0324 / AmbientWeather FT005TH temp/hum sensor (58.4%)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ liftmaster_433_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: LiftMaster
|
||||
- **Category**: garage_door
|
||||
- **Got**: AlectoV1 Weather Sensor (Alecto WS3500 WS4500 Ventus W155/W044 Oregon) (confidence: 49.4%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
**Top 5 Matches**:
|
||||
1. AlectoV1 Weather Sensor (Alecto WS3500 WS4500 Ventus W155/W044 Oregon) (49.4%)
|
||||
2. Oregon Scientific SL109H Remote Thermal Hygro Sensor (49.4%)
|
||||
3. Philips outdoor temperature sensor (type AJ3650) (43.0%)
|
||||
4. Philips outdoor temperature sensor (type AJ7010) (43.0%)
|
||||
5. Globaltronics GT-WT-02 Sensor (39.5%)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ liftmaster_security2_raw_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: LiftMaster Security+ 2.0
|
||||
- **Category**: garage_door
|
||||
- **Got**: No matches (confidence: 0.0%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ ge_doorbell_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: GE Doorbell
|
||||
- **Category**: doorbell
|
||||
- **Got**: Conrad S3318P, FreeTec NC-5849-913 temperature humidity sensor, ORIA WA50 ST389 temperature sensor (confidence: 76.9%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
**Top 5 Matches**:
|
||||
1. Conrad S3318P, FreeTec NC-5849-913 temperature humidity sensor, ORIA WA50 ST389 temperature sensor (76.9%)
|
||||
2. WEC-2103 temperature/humidity sensor (76.9%)
|
||||
3. ThermoPro TX-2C Thermometer and Humidity sensor (76.3%)
|
||||
4. Biltema rain gauge (75.8%)
|
||||
5. FT-004-B Temperature Sensor (75.7%)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ byron_doorbell_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: Byron Doorbell
|
||||
- **Category**: doorbell
|
||||
- **Got**: Princeton (confidence: 92.9%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
**Top 5 Matches**:
|
||||
1. Princeton (92.9%)
|
||||
2. Generic Remote SC226x EV1527 (84.1%)
|
||||
3. Elro DB286A Doorbell (83.2%)
|
||||
4. Blyss DC5-UK-WH (82.7%)
|
||||
5. Acurite 590TX Temperature with optional Humidity (82.7%)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ rgb_led_remote_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: RGB LED Remote
|
||||
- **Category**: led_controller
|
||||
- **Got**: No matches (confidence: 0.0%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ ceiling_fan_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: Ceiling Fan Remote
|
||||
- **Category**: fan_controller
|
||||
- **Got**: No matches (confidence: 0.0%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ ceiling_fan2_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: Ceiling Fan Remote
|
||||
- **Category**: fan_controller
|
||||
- **Got**: No matches (confidence: 0.0%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
### ✗ ceiling_fan_light_real.sub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: Ceiling Fan Light
|
||||
- **Category**: fan_controller
|
||||
- **Got**: No matches (confidence: 0.0%)
|
||||
- **Rank**: Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user